While I’ve been in Puerto Vallarta, I decided to test something I’ve always wondered:
How different is the calorie burn between regular walking, interval walking, fast walking, and Zone 2 running?
So, for four days, I set my timer for around 30 minutes and did each style of movement:
- Regular walking pace
- Interval walking
- Faster, power-walking pace
- Zone 2 running
And the results surprised me in the best way.

🏃♀️ The Results:
Even though I love running (it’s my therapy!), the calorie burn between walking styles and running wasn’t dramatically different.
In fact…
✨ Faster walking and interval walking gave me almost the same calorie burn as running — without the joint stress, recovery time, or exhaustion afterwards.
This experiment reminded me of something important for women over 40:
Why Walking Is So Powerful for Fat Loss
Walking is one of the most underrated forms of exercise. And for fat loss over 40, it’s actually ideal.
Here’s why:
✔ 1. It supports hormone balance
High-intensity workouts spike cortisol. Walking, especially Zone 1–2, reduces it — helping minimize cravings and overeating.
✔ 2. It burns calories without burnout
Because it’s low-impact, you can walk daily… which means you burn more overall across a week.
✔ 3. It’s gentle on joints
Especially important for those of us with knee arthritis or past injuries.
✔ 4. It boosts cardiovascular fitness
Zone 2 walking and running both strengthen your heart — the pace doesn’t need to be extreme.
✔ 5. It’s sustainable
Consistency beats intensity every single time.

The Biggest Lesson?
👉 Walking “counts.”
👉 Walking supports fat loss.
👉 Walking is absolutely enough.
And if you love running, fantastic — keep running.
But you don’t need high-intensity cardio to make progress. Most days, a simple walk wins.

Which movement do you enjoy most?
Are you team stroll, team power walk, or team runner?

Leave a Reply